Scientific Program

Search

SELECT AND VIEW SESSIONS OF YOUR CHOICE

Deselect All
Day 2
September 11 (Fri)
12:00-12:30
Free Paper Session 4 (Hip & Pelvis)
 Room C
Speaker(s) 12:00–12:04 F4-1. Unraveling the Dancer’s Hip: A Meta-Analysis of Snapping Hip, Bony Morphology, and Intra-Articular Pathologies
Byung-Ho Yoon (Ewha Womans University, College of Medicine, Mokdong Hospital, Seoul, Korea, Korea, Republic of)
12:04–12:08 F4-2. Comparison of Capsular Healing Status on Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Clinical Outcomes Between Periportal and Interportal Capsulotomy in Hip Arthroscopic Management for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrom
Soshi Uchida (Wakamatsu hospital of University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan)
12:08–12:12 F4-3. 3D-Printed Polydopamine-Polyurethane Scaffold in a Porcine Model Contributes to Chondral Regeneration in Acetabular Labrum Reconstruction
Cancan Du (Peking University Third Hospital, China)
12:12–12:16 F4-4. Anatomical Alignment of the Acetabular Component Using Transverse Acetabular Ligament in Total Hip Replacement: A Prospective Cohort
Hieu Nguyen Dinh (E Hospital, Vietnam National University, Vietnam)
12:16–12:20 F4-5. Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of 3D-Printed Patient-Specific Acetabular Implants in Complex Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Mid-Term Follow-up of 49 Cases
Chan Young Lee (Chonnam National Univeristy Hwasun Hospital, Korea, Republic of)
12:20-12:30 Discussion
Day 2
September 11 (Fri)
13:30-14:30
Free Paper Session 5 (Knee)
 Room C
Speaker(s) 13:30–13:34 F5-1. Clinical and Arthroscopic Outcomes of Remnant-Preserving ACL Reconstruction: The Role of Remnant Volume
Akinori Nekomoto (Hiroshima University, Japan)
13:34–13:38 F5-2. Quadriceps Tendon Autograft May Show Higher Revision Risk Than Hamstring Tendon After Primary ACL Reconstruction: A Citation-Ranked Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Sang Hyun Kang (Redland Hospital Queensland Health, Australia)
13:38–13:42 F5-3. Comparative outcomes of all-inside versus conventional full tibial tunnel anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: minimum 4-Year follow-up
Keith Hay-Man Wan (Kwong Wah Hospital, Hong Kong, China)
13:42–13:46 F5-4. Superficial Rectus Femoris Versus Hamstring Autograft for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Randomized Comparative Study of Early Functional Recovery
Amgalankhuu Orkhontuul (Mongolian National University of Medical Sciences, Ulaanbaatar, National Trauma and Orthopedic Research Center, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia)
13:46–13:50 F5-5. All-inside Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Combined with Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis for the Treatment of Adolescent Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries: Early to Mid-term Outcomes
Chenjian Peng (Nanjing Hospital of Chinese Medicine Affiliated to Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, China)
13:50–14:00 Discussion
14:00–14:04 F5-6. Functionalized Metal-Organic Frameworks Loaded with Ultra-Small Pt-Se Nanoenzymes Promote Osteoarthritis Repair via Efficient ROS Scavenging and Macrophage Polarization Modulation
Guo Jiang (Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, China)
14:04–14:08 F5-7. Morphological MRI evaluation of autologous cultured cartilage in the femoral trochlea: comparison between periosteal and collagen membranes at 3 years (CaTCh study)
Yuta Masaki (Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Japan)
14:08–14:12 F5-8. Prognostic Factors for Clinical Outcomes After Knee Cartilage Repair Using Microfracture or Biologic Augmentation: A Systematic Review
Joo Hyung Han (Arthroscopy and Joint Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Korea, Republic of)
14:12–14:16 F5-9. Risk-benefit stratification for patient selection in biological cartilage repair: a clinical decision score developed on open-access registry data
Ardian Riza (Orthopaedi and Traumatologi- Sport Injury Division Rumah Sakit Dr. M.Djamil / Andalas University Faculty of Medicine, Rumah Sakit Khusus Bedah Kartika Docta, Indonesia)
14:16–14:20 F5-10. Accelerated varus progression is associated with an increased risk of knee surgery in individuals aged ≤60 years with varus knees and Kellgren–Lawrence grade ≤3
Kee Soo Kang (Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Korea, Republic of)
14:20-14:30 Discussion
Day 2
September 11 (Fri)
16:50-17:50
Free Paper Session 6 (Knee)
 Room C
Speaker(s) 16:50–16:54 F6-1. Incidence of Flatfoot Deformity After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Peroneus Longus Autograft: A Mid-Term Observational Study
Ludwig Pontoh (Fatmawati General Hospital, Indonesia)
16:54–16:58 F6-2. Does a Concomitant Low-Grade Anteromedial Structural Injury Affect Anterior Tibial Translation and Rotational Knee Stability in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears? — A Prospective Controlled Study
Jiangtao Dong (The Third Hospital of Hebei medical university, China)
16:58–17:02 F6-3. Biomechanical Effects of Anterior Closing Wedge Osteotomy on Knee Laxity and Position in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstructed Knees: A Cadaveric Study
Atsuki Tanaka (Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan)
17:02–17:06 F6-4. Notch-Referenced Mediolateral Verification of Tibial Tunnel Position in ACL Reconstruction: A 3D Imaging Validation Study
Thang Vu Duc (Vinmec Healthcare System, Vietnam)
17:06–17:10 F6-5. Short-term immobilization followed by treadmill running improves graft-to-bone healing in a murine model of delayed healing of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
Yuki Suzuki (Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Hospital for Special Surgery, Japan)
17:10–17:20 Discussion
17:20–17:24 F6-6. Early Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Versus Rehabilitation in Natural Setting of a Developing Country: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in Indonesia
Romy Deviandri (Universitas Riau, Indonesia)
17:24–17:28 F6-7. Rotational Subluxation Patterns on Stress Radiography and Clinical Relevance in PCL-Deficient Knees: A 2D-3D Registration Study
Younghoon Yang (Madisesang Hospital, Samsung Medical Center, Korea, Republic of)
17:28–17:32 F6-8. Improved Activity, Return to Sport, and Graft Survivorship with Suture-Augmented Versus Isolated Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using All-Soft Tissue Grafts: A Retrospective Propensity Analysis With a Minimum 2-Year Follow-up
Yi-tian Gao (Peking University Third Hospital, China)
17:32–17:36 F6-9. Implant-free arthroscopic suture-based trans-osseous fixation of anterior cruciate ligament tibial avulsion: a novel surgical technique.
Saurabh K P (Prasad Ortho Care; Sparsh Hospital, Bangalore, India)
17:36–17:40 F6-10. Layer-specific collagen composition of the quadriceps tendon across physical maturity: implications for graft selection in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
Yushin Mizuno (Kanazawa University Hospital, Japan)
17:40–17:50 Discussion